The Lean Startup Approach

The lean startup approach for developing new products or businesses has become popular among companies and entrepreneurs. But what can you do to make this approach effective in practice?

The lean approach was devised in the early 2000s. Its key features are formulating hypotheses about different aspects of the business and testing each hypothesis by interviewing potential clients and consumers. In this methodology, pushing testable prototypes to the customers is also an effective way to validate an idea.

Using this method, teams can avoid devoting time and energy to ideas that won’t work in the real world, and instead emerge with a viable plan of attack. This approach has taken the entrepreneurship world by storm. Established companies such as Dropbox, Slack, or even Nike have embraced it to rapidly test and refine ideas for products or businesses.


photo-1566140967404-b8b3932483f5 (1).jfif

Educationally diverse teams are the first step. (source:

In a recent Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal article, researchers published the first study to experimentally test the key assumptions of lean startup by having a specific focus on the composition of the startup team. Using unique and detailed longitudinal data on 152 NSF‐supported lean‐startup teams, they have found that the key components of the method — hypothesis formulation, probing, and business idea convergence — link up as expected. They have also found that team composition is an important boundary condition: formal training in learning‐by‐thinking methods – such as business‐educated members (MBAs) - appears to limit the spread of learning‐by‐doing methods. In this way, business theory constrains business practice.


You may wonder why it is so. Learning‐by‐thinking methods use mental representations of the environment to plan how a firm's solutions address problems. Learning‐by‐doing methods are based on taking action and learning from experience. The three main approaches of learning-by-doing are trial‐and‐error, bricolage, and experiment.

  • In trial‐and‐error, many ideas are tried in the hopes of stumbling upon a promising one.
  • In bricolage, solutions that already exist at hand are combined in new ways.
  • Experiment, the third major learning‐by‐doing approach, is based on testing hypotheses with somewhat controlled – or alternatively, light‐weight experiments lacking controlled – circumstances.



Jake Knapp’s Sprint is its step-by-step breakdown of what it takes to solve big problems and do work that matters with speed and urgency (source:


Teams with MBA members who started using the components of the method (particularly in customer interviews) were more likely - relative to teams without MBA members - to improve the teams’ business ideas. This facilitates benefits if we get MBAs to embrace the method in the first place. So, if you are a business school alum, prepare for some discomfort at first — but know your skills will give you a boost when it comes time to analyse the results of your probe.


Besides, educational diversity seems to have an impact in the model, too. First, overconfidence in the team's existing approach and overoptimism regarding initial business ideas occurs more likely when the team is homogeneous. This is because homogeneous teams share a similar domain knowledge and are likely to consolidate their pre-existing beliefs when observing that their teammates have the same beliefs. In contrast, more diverse teams are likely to be collectively less confident and more sceptical in their methods and in their starting position, because of the lack of consensus about a given domain of knowledge.

Therefore, the presence of educational diversity in the team would go hand‐in‐hand with a predisposition to engage in probing. Second, educationally diverse teams can more easily envision access to a broader set of potential stakeholders, making it mechanically easier for such teams to engage in hypothesis probing. Third, by having a broader knowledge‐base and stakeholder arena to build on, educationally diverse teams are likely to have a broader view of the opportunity landscape. This broader view could help diverse teams see both needs and solutions from different perspectives.



Do not forget to test your hypotheses! (source:


Finally, when it comes to developing hypotheses, it is worthy to focus on quality, not quantity. Keep in mind, that it is much easier to probe a few clear, thoughtful hypotheses than lots of vague, slapdash ones.



Harward Business Review: To Make Lean Startups Work

Leatherbee, M., & Katila, R. (2020). The lean startup method: Early‐stage teams and hypothesis‐based probing of business ideas. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal14(4), 570-593. 

Latest blog

What is the best practice in a crisis? Survival vs Advanced Mode
We've already discussed the recession in a previous blog post, but as we move forward into the new year, uncertainty keeps growing and until the necessary cost-cutting decisions are made, the future of the business is not yet secure - apart from a moment of relief.
Business Model Canvas: a simple project management tool
What is the Business Model Canvas, what does it look like, what elements does it consist of and how does it support the day-to-day operations of businesses?
All about business planning - launching the new SCIENCER
Your business plans, advisors, innovative ideas and business inspiration: just a hint of what's to come on the Sciencer platform in 2023. Over the past year we have been planning, analyzing and preparing through our business development consultancy projects to present our new tool that can help you not only survive the challenges of 2023, but also gain a competitive advantage.
Strategy Planning for 2023
Companies who start their strategic planning after the new year put themselves at a huge disadvantage. Late planning means that teams and individuals react to the fire drill of the day as opposed to proactively tackling the right set of priorities.When you don’t plan ahead, you lose  valuable selling time and put Q1 at risk.